Skip to content

Archives

Breakfast at tiffanys asian


breakfast at tiffanys asian

Breakfast at Tiffanys Catering, Cramlington: See 7 unbiased reviews of Breakfast at Tiffanys Catering, rated 5 of 5 on Tripadvisor and ranked #25 of Breakfast at Tiffany's (Chinese Edition) Hardcover – May 1, The book is on the ground of New York during the Second World War which tells Holly, a Henry Mancini: More Than Music – A featurette about Henry Mancini, "Moon River" and interviews with Mancini's wife and children. Mr. Yunioshi: An Asian.
breakfast at tiffanys asian

Hey! What&#;s up, you guys? It&#;s Awais from Book Summaries, and today it&#;s time for me to finally make my Breakfast at Tiffany&#;s book summary analysis by Truman Capote. I read this book quite a while ago, but I wanted to wait until I saw the movie to do my review to talk about both because most people experience the story for the first time by watching the movie. So, I wanted to talk about both, and it took me a while before I started this and finished it. So, today we&#;re going to be talking about the very, very well-known novella, Breakfast at Tiffany&#;s, by Truman Capote.

Breakfast at Tiffany&#;s book summary Beginning

We&#;re going to start talking about the novella, and then we will talk about the movie and probably compare while talking about this. Breakfast at Tiffany&#;s was published inand it follows a woman named Holly Golightly.

The narrator of the story is called Fred by Holly, but Holly is the show&#;s star. At the story&#;s beginning, Fred moves into the same building as Holly, and they have a quick friendship. And it follows Fred as he gets to know Holly better and is trying to live his life in New York and be a good friend to Holly. Holly Golightly is not a good person. She is this blonde woman who is very aloof, who is very mysterious. She does not want people to know about her, and so when people ask her questions about herself, she always diverts them to something else.

She has this way that people find her fascinating, and she almost expects people to hang onto her every word. The character, Fred, thinks that she is engaging and pays attention to her a lot. That&#;s why Fred ends up finding out a lot more about her life than most people do around her. Holly, in the story, says that she will never get used to anything. She says that anybody that does might as well be dead or something like that.

Self-Motivation to Become Self-Independent

So, she does not want to settle down. She got afraid of being stuck in one place. She doesn&#;t want to invest in anyplace or anybody. She&#;s okay if people invest in her, but she does not want to reciprocate those feelings. And she works very hard to keep herself separate and independent and on the move. And it just follows these two characters and a few others while they&#;re living in New York, and their lives are very messy. It&#;s one of those situations where you know you are headed towards a bad ending, a messy ending like a train wreck, but you can&#;t look away.

As usual with my book reviews, I&#;m going to go through my pros, go through my cons, give my rating, and then we&#;re going to talk about the movie. My first pro for this book was Holly&#;s characterization. I thought that Holly was so attractive, and that may be because Fred also felt that she was so interesting.

You learn about her in this novella against her will, which the characters know about her. So, as they are almost, like, fighting to be her friend because she makes it difficult, they&#;re learning stuff, and you&#;re learning stuff too. So, you end up getting invested in Holly, and it is so well done. I thought that that was probably one of the biggest pros for this book &#; Holly&#;s characterization and how you learn about her in bits and pieces, and then everything starts to unfold.

Another pro for this book is that I enjoyed the writing style. Fred tells it in kind of, like, different tenses. He switches back and forth, so it seems like someone is talking to you about her in the present or what he thinks she&#;s doing in the present and what happened in the past. So, you get that feeling of someone who is talking to you and describing someone they once knew in their life and sharing memories and just general present-day thoughts. So, I enjoyed that as well. In some of my other reviews, I commented that Truman Capote details in his writing.

So much so that sometimes it bogs down the plots. In this, I didn&#;t feel like that at all. I felt like it had details. It had tiny, little things about Holly that gave you some insights into how she&#;s thinking, or into Fred and how he&#;s thinking, and stuff like that, but it did. So, it didn&#;t slog anything down. There are details like how she keeps her phone in a suitcase and stuff like that &#; and where she keeps her shoes and what she keeps in the oven, which is, like, not pans or anything like that. So, you get all these details, but it&#;s not overbearing. It is a very quick novella to get through. I also really liked Fred as a narrator. He starts very &#; almost innocent.

Fred Growing Up With New Spirit

He&#;s new to New York. He&#;s just figuring things out, and throughout the story, Fred starts to grow and becomes more cynical. And you get to see Fred develop, and change, and learn as he learns more about Holly. So, I think Holly and Fred were both perfect, complete, believable characters, and yeah, I enjoyed Fred. Breakfast at tiffanys asian, I liked the characters. I liked the writing. I thought that the plot was interesting in this as well.

Maybe not as well done as the other two, but I felt invested in the story. I wanted to know what would happen with Holly because you know that she&#;s such a mess that something messy will happen. So, I was waiting to find out what that was going to be and how it would be handled by Holly, Fred, and Truman. as he was writing it. And the last pro that I had written down, which I talked about already, was that I did like knowing &#;

Like, it gave me that feeling that something messy was going to happen, and then it delivered. And I just enjoyed that entire process. I thought that it well did and was enjoyable. It kept my attention the whole time, and yeah, I had a lovely time while reading this. If you want to watch the Breakfast at Tiffany&#;s book summary.

I wrote down breakfast at tiffanys asian couple cc cream vs bb cream vs tinted moisturizer cons. These were not conning for union savings bank mt washington because they didn&#;t affect my reading experience all health insurance plan usa much, but many people hate Holly in this. She expects to be gifted things for nothing. She is not a good person, and she&#;s not a good person &#; like, she&#;s not meant to be. At least, that&#;s how I think about this novella. Like, I wouldn&#;t say I liked Holly. She&#;s terrible, but she&#;s so exciting that I wanted to learn more about her.

So, I think that was the goal, which is what this book &#; this novella &#; delivers. So, if you&#;re going into this and you&#;re thinking that you&#;re going to love Holly, especially if you&#;ve watched the movie, change that expectation because I don&#;t believe that you will like her.

You will find her attractive, though. And the other con that people have card in the yard maryland this is that they couldn&#;t connect with any character, which is understandable. Holly is terrible, so it&#;s hard to communicate with her because she is so awful and self-centered in this novella.

Why is it called to breakfast at Tiffany&#;s?

It&#;s the trust that only decent things occur there that styles Tiffany&#;s so tempting to her. So why select this as the title? The title draws consideration to Holly without having to name her precisely – she&#;s the only one in the book who dears the store so much.

And Fred is a little hard to relate to because he follows Holly like a bit of a puppy dog. They are a little challenging to connect with, but I think it&#;s more long i love you quotes for him an &#;I&#;m watching these messes of people be messes, and it is entertaining.&#; So those didn&#;t affect my reading experience, but they might affect yours if you have different expectations going in.

When I finished this novella, I searched for various reviews, which is how Walmart eye center mexico mo pulled some of the cons that other people had, but I just had such a good time. I enjoyed this. I ended up giving the novella four stars. Yeah, I think that it is a well-craft novella following really believable messes of people doing messy things.

So, I enjoyed it. Then months after I finished this, I decided it was time to watch the movie finally. It is no secret that Truman Capote wrote this story thinking that Marilyn Monroe would play the main character. And when you read the novella, you&#;ll see the connections between them. Like, the main character in the novella is blonde.

Breakfast at Tiffany&#;s book summary Climax

She is very in charge of her sexuality. Like, men fawn over her, that kind of thing. She&#;s very, very beautiful, and she is like a socialite, and people pay her to go to social events or be at events with them. And I feel like people have that same sense of Marilyn Monroe a little bit, but when it came down to it, the people directing the movie or casting the movie chose Audrey Hepburn because 1) they wanted Audrey Hepburn.

They didn&#;t even think that she would accept the role, and she did anyway. And Marilyn was doing something else. She had some other movie that she was part of. It ended up being Audrey Hepburn, and it&#;s funny. When watching the movie, I was like, &#;These are so similar at the beginning and the middle.&#;

I will say that a character constantly badgers throughout the story in their building and yells at her a lot. I honestly cannot remember if the surface is Asian in the novella. The character was Asian. His name was Yunioshi, and the actor who plays that character is white. And they put him in yellowface, and he was way over the top and offensive.

Like, when I watched the movie, I recoiled when I saw that. It was, like, Woah, this guy looks 1) not Asian, and it was not a good portrayal. I, finishing the movie, watched the special features. They have a whole thing, where I think they&#;re all Asian Americans, talking about it and discussing the representation.

What is breakfast at Tiffany&#;s about?

This novel is about a girl who falls in love with a writer. She struggles to achieve him and wants to see her life partner.

Hey, What was going on at the time, what went on since, and how Asian representation in movies progressed years—stuff like that. So, I appreciate that this edition of the film had that as a unique feature so that people can watch that, and like, learn and know that that was not a good thing.

And the director of this movie even said he would go back i will wait for you shane and shane change it, so I&#;m glad to see people are growing. But that was like, Woah! Anyway, the movie is quite similar to the book. Holly is a Huge Mess. She is in this weird situation where she pays to meet someone at a prison similar to here. She&#;s not a great person. She was still very self-centered. The narrator is quite similar as well. They give him a name in the movie and a more interesting backstory, so I think Fred is more interested in the film than he was in the book or the novella.

But I do think they kept a similar spirit in the beginning. In the book and the movie, Holly even talks about something called the mean reds, which is like some extreme anxiety or something similar that she goes through. The only way to alleviate that is to grab some breakfast and go to Tiffany&#;s. And that&#;s why it is called Breakfast at Tiffany&#;s because it calms her down and helps with the mean reds. Even similar events happen where Holly&#;s past comes back into her life, into her present, and that&#;s the same.

Breakfast at Tiffany&#;s Themes
  • Female Freedom and Independence.
  • Money, Joy, and Possessiveness.
  • Life partner, Affection, and Sexuality.
  • Private and Obsession.

It has very similar beats. I will say that the movie is a little bit more like a romantic comedy, almost a movie, and the book is not like that. The film changes things up. It focuses on Fred and Holly about the same. They have a different sort of relationship in the movie than they do in the book. In the film, I like how they say that you end up running into yourself no matter where you run, which I think is partially true, at least in Holly&#;s case.

Audrey Hepburn&#;s portrayal of Holly, though in the movie, is a little more put together. She&#;s a little more, like, classy. I can see why people like Holly more in the film than in the book because they can see how she&#;s dressing and poised just because Audrey Hepburn balanced.

I see why people like her fashion sense, but she&#;s still when it comes down to it, kind of the wrong person in the majority of the movie. And I think the last thing I have to say about the film besides enjoying it is that the movie&#;s ending is so different from the book. I was not expecting it because they were tracking pretty similarly for an extended portion of the story. Here is breakfast at tiffany&#;s book ending.

Breakfast at Tiffany&#;s book summary Ending

Then the ending completely goes in its direction, which I think is a good call because people hate Holly in this novella, and if they kept it the same, they&#;d probably hate her in this as well. So, by changing it, people love her in this movie, and I get it now.

Like, when I finished it and people are like, &#;Audrey Hepburn!&#; and &#;Holly Golightly!&#; and &#;Breakfast at Tiffany&#;s!&#; I understand why this is beloved by people that love Audrey Hepburn because they changed the ending so much. I enjoyed the movie. I wanted the changes. Truman Capote did not enjoy the changes and the film, which I thought was interesting.

Yeah, I enjoyed both. I think you&#;ll enjoy the movie if you know about the lousy portrayal of an Asian in this, and that is not okay. The film is a little bit more romantic, a little easier to digest, and the book is fascinating, and the characters are messy and continue to be confused. So again, I gave Breakfast at Tiffany&#;s four stars. I don&#;t rate movies, but I enjoyed them both. So that&#;s going to be my review for Breakfast at Tiffany&#;s by Truman Capote.

If you like breakfast at tiffany&#;s book review, then support us by subscribing and keep visiting the book summaries. Thank you.

Categories FictionalTags #breakfastattiffany&#;sbookanalysis, #breakfastattiffany&#;sbookending, #breakfastattiffany&#;sbookreview, #breakfastattiffany&#;sbookthemes, #breakfastattiffany&#;scharacters, #whatisbreakfastattiffany&#;sabout, #whyisitcalledbreakfastattiffany&#;sИсточник: mynewextsetup.us

“Breakfast at Tiffany’s”: Movie of Contrasts

Introduction

Breakfast at Tiffany’s is one of the most famous and provocative movies in American cinematography during the s. This work attracts much attention at different epochs due to its possibility to introduce several really iconic characters, prove the influence of fashion in society, and identify the inequalities that can determine human lives in a variety of ways. There are many controversies in the movie beginning from its title (Tiffany’s is not the place for breakfast) and ending with the portrayal of Mr. Yunioshi.

We will write a
custom essay
specifically for you

for only $$11/page

certified writers online

Learn More

The work of Blake Edwards, the director of the film, as well as the actors like Audrey Hepburn, George Peppard, and Mikey Rooney, provoke multiple feelings and attitudes to the style of life, people’s choices, and the creation of relationships. In this paper, Breakfast at Tiffany’s will be reviewed as a movie of contrasts with a unique connection between the settings, camera movements, characters’ development, historical events, and gender-racial judgments.

Main body

The movie was released at the beginning of the s. It was the time when America was involved in the civil rights movements, antiwar protests, and political dissensions (Harris 34). People had to face serious gender issues and the necessity to include female expectations into regular capital one apply for first credit card relationships. Five nominations for Academy Awards and an impressive list of other nominations and victories like Golden Globe, Grammy Awards, and Writers Guild can be used as the main evidence that Breakfast at Tiffany’s made certain contributions to the growth of Breakfast at tiffanys asian cinematography and the discussion of the issues that mattered during the time of its production.

Edwards created a romantic comedy through the lines of which serious topics like racism, betrayal, and greed are disclosed. However, the presence of such great actors like Hepburn and Peppard was not enough to promote the success of this type of movie.

Cinematographic techniques and the director&#;s decisions like an objective viewpoint at Tiffany’s in the opening scene of the movie cannot be ignored. It tells about the influence of fashion and money on people promotes human possibility to do nothing but accept the truth and stay small and insignificant in the shadow of such giants as Tiffany’s. Eye-level shots can be used to explain breakfast at tiffanys asian worth of human relationships and the intentions of the director to promote social equality and fair attitudes.

Many people call this movie controversial because of a number of discussions and disagreements. For example, despite her intentions to find out satisfaction and stability in her life, the main character, Holly, first rejects Paul and his feelings, saying that “we belong to nobody, and nobody belongs to us. We don’t even belong to each other” (Breakfast at Tiffany’s). At the same time, Holly has a purpose and can build plans, believing that “I could find a real-life place that’s make me feel like Tiffany’s, then – then I’d app store card some furniture and give the cat a name” (Breakfast at Tiffany’s).

Another example of controversy consists of symbols when Holy tries to avoid any kind of sage and dependence on other people and demonstrate her “free spirit” without even knowing that she is “already in that cage” that she built for herself (Breakfast at Tiffany’s). Holly hates and scares zoos where she can see animals in cages, and she cannot even guess that she is a part of that zoo, and it is high time to break the rules and start changing something.

Get your
% original paper
on any topic

done in as little as
3 hours

Learn More

Controversies of the movie can also be traced in its racial tensions and gender inequalities. At the time of the production of Breakfast at Tiffany’s, the United States survived the outcomes of World War II and the Vietnamese War that had a negative impact on the relationships between African-Americans, Asians, and Americans (Chow). The decision to give the role of Yunioshi to white Rooney caused many problems and critical responses.

His offensive caricatures of the Asians seemed to be funny to many people except those of Asian descent. Breakfast at Tiffany’s is a comedy, and Rooney’s role in it is impressive through yellowface makeup, huge glasses, and terrible teeth. If these scenes can be considered racially offensive today, they were rather entertaining in the s. However, “it’s what everybody always thinks but everybody happens to be wrong” (Breakfast at Tiffany’s). Edwards regretted this decision with time, but the history had already been made, and nothing could be changed.

What the director never regretted was the choice of a commerce bank hours for a leading role. Hepburn represented the image of a woman during the s in one of the most provocative and interesting ways. The mass in her room, unpredictable moods, and the attitudes to the people around prove unclear and constantly changing female expectations and doubts. Being a leading character, Holly always depends on the events and people. She wants to achieve stability and happiness, but she constantly chooses a wrong or too complicated way.

Conclusion

In the end, love wins, and feelings help the characters to find out the truth. Instead of richness and stability, Holly chooses a kiss in the rain, proving again that female expectations may rapidly change. Her life disorder, extreme ups, and painful downs do not give Holly a serious lesson, but she is never upset and ready to try farmers state bank cedar rapids new stage of relationships with a cat having a name and a man holding her hand.

Works Cited

Breakfast at Tiffany’s. Directed by Blake Edwards, performances by Audrey Hepburn, George Peppard, and Patricia Neal, Paramount Pictures,

Chow, Keith. “Why Won’t Hollywood Cast Asian Actors?The New York Times. Web.

Harris, Frederick C. “The Next Civil Rights Movement?” Dissent, vol. 62, no. 3,

We will write a custom
essays
specifically
for you!

Get your first paper with
15% OFF

Learn More

Источник: mynewextsetup.us

Introduction Popular culture has an effect on its audiences (Wilson mynewextsetup.us, p. 74). It has the ability to breakfast at tiffanys asian reactions and change public opinion. A popular type of popular culture is film. Films are a reflection of society, primarily the thoughts of the elites in society (Wilson et al., p. 74) Films that have the most influence on the public are cult classics or iconic films. Iconic films inspire people to change anything from their style to their career, but they also have the ability to change the way people think, by conveying a message that promotes elitist views. Breakfast at Tiffany’s is an iconic film that does just that. Breakfast at Tiffany’s is regarded as one of the most influential films of the twentieth century and for…show more content…
The emergence of the Civil Rights Movements, caused early filmmakers to re-evaluate and revise the way that they were portraying minority characters, however, they continued the use of stereotypes within their characters (Smith, p). The filmmakers believed that they were making a positive switch to portraying Asian Americans as comical fools, as shown in Breakfast at Tiffany’s as opposed to the cold and menacing villains they once shown to be, but the new portrayal played off racial stereotypes that offended those who watched it (Smith,p). Another factor that Silk () explains is the reason behind production. Mainstream media was producing for audiences that were primarily white families, so they wanted their products to reflect the lives of those who consumed the media (p. ). At this point in time film was used as an assimilation tactic, which is why white actors were used to play characters of all race (Smith, p). By hiring white actors to play other races, producers believed that their target audience would be able to relate to characters. (Smith,

Get Access

Источник: mynewextsetup.us

Breakfast at Tiffany’s is off the menu for me because of its racial stereotyping

Despite what Elon Musk says (Keep on trucking: a swipe at rail as Tesla unveils electric lorry, 18 November), there is still a crucial role for rail freight in transporting long-distance consumer and bulk traffic in a safer low-carbon way that reduces road congestion and road damage. Also, lorry platoons already exist and are called freight trains. So, during road safety week ( November) we should remember that last year heavy goods vehicles were almost seven times more likely than cars to be involved in fatal crashes on local roads.
Philippa Edmunds
Freight on rail manager, Campaign for Better Transport

One of my best-loved films, Breakfast at Tiffany’s, is now unwatchable by me for the stereotypical portrayal of Mr Yunioshi by Mickey Rooney (I like Apu from the Simpsons. But I can see the harm in stereotypes, 18 November). My father’s critical perspective was influenced by the heroine being a call girl, but then he’d been through a war against, among others, the Japanese.
Jenny Powell
Storrington, Sussex

Interesting to see a Conservative MP, Damian Collins, apparently referencing Uber as a benchmark for exploitation (UK athletes ‘have fewer rights than an Uber driver’, Sport, 20 November). Just came off the tip of the tongue, I guess…
Sonia Michaels
London

Further to recent letters (20 November), in the 50s in London we had “milk and a dash” at the Lyons Corner Houses – definitely the forerunner of lattes. A lot cheaper, too.
Rosalie Trayner
London

Hurrah! A campaign to rescue Italian words from English mispronunciation. May we add to the list “bruschetta” (broo-sketta, not broo-shetta) and “ciabatta” (cha-batta, not che-a-batta)?
Bernadette Newman
London

Did Theresa May and her husband not go to church on Sunday? There was no photo of them in Monday’s paper.
Susannah Wight
London

Join the debate – email [email protected]

Read more Guardian letters – click here to visit mynewextsetup.us

Источник: mynewextsetup.us

Breakfast at Tiffany's (United States, )

Breakfast at Tiffany's Poster

The trajectories traversed by the careers of certain directors can be strange and unfathomable things. Take Blake Edwards, for example. Throughout the s and s, Edwards was an A-list filmmaker with a string of impressive titles on his resume: Breakfast at Tiffany's, Days of Wine and Roses, 10, and (of course) The Pink Panther series. With the s and s, however, Edwards' reputation went into a meltdown as each successive outing became less enjoyable and more tiresome: The Man Who Loved Women, A Fine Mess, Blind Date, Skin Deep, Switch, and The Son of the Pink Panther.

Were it not for the better Pink Panther entries, Breakfast at Tiffany's would likely be the crown jewel of Edwards' career. Although the romantic comedy would not appear on many critics' all-time best lists, it remains a favorite among the general movie-going community and, over the years, has developed a legion of die-hard supporters. The film has more charm than the average romantic comedy, but, when considered from a bare-bones perspective, it follows most of the rules that define the genre. The ending, for example, is pure Hollywood, as are many of the steps taken by George Axelrod's screenplay to get us there from the opening credits.

Breakfast at Tiffany's is based on a novella by Truman Capote, and recounts one man's fascination with and love for a fellow inhabitant of his mid-scale New York City apartment building. While many of the book's broad strokes (and even a few of the details) were retained in Axelrod's script, changes were instituted to make the movie more palatable to a mainstream audience. Chief of these is the nature of the relationship between the two leads, which results in a new, different, and more optimistic finale.

Star power is a key to Breakfast at Tiffany's success. This is a showcase for Audrey Hepburn who, at age 32, was in her acting prime. (Ironically, Capote championed giving the part to Marilyn Monroe.) Although never a "great" actress in the traditional sense, Hepburn possessed charisma and screen presence, and this era was her time to shine. With Sabrina, Roman Holiday, War and Peace, and Funny Face behind her, and My Fair Ladystill to come, Hepburn was an undeniable box office draw. Her interpretation of Breakfast at Tiffany's lead, Holly Golightly, is nearly perfect. And it isn't just the countless costume changes (although style and elegance have always been Hepburn's defining characteristics). Actually, this is not an easy role; it requires Hepburn to do more than smile at the camera and drawl her lines - although Holly at first appears to be little more than an airheaded, jet-setting socialite, the more we get to know her, the more we home remedies for uti in 5 year old the pain and loss that have led her to embrace her current lifestyle. Holly has low self-esteem and a sordid past, and she has surrounded herself with bright, gaudy things in an effort to give herself a level of comfort. She's a phony, but, in the words of a supporting character, she's a "real" phony.

Opposite Hepburn, playing struggling author Paul Varjak, is George Peppard. Although Peppard's star never ascended to the level of Hepburn's (he is probably best remembered for two TV programs: "Banacek" and "The A-Team"), for at least one movie he gets to stand in the spotlight (although about all he does is "stand" - the script requires minimal range from Peppard, fast food restaurant, as a result, his performance comes across as somewhat bland). He and Hepburn generate an effective level of chemistry. San jose state ranking on-screen interaction has a breezy, natural feel to it, allowing us to believe that their characters click.

Breakfast at Tiffany's uses a simple story to good effect. The film starts by introducing us to Holly as she window shops her way through Manhattan. Paul, an author with a bad case of writer's block, is the new tenant in her building. The two meet on the morning Paul moves in, when he drops by to use Holly's phone. Soon after, they become friends. One night, when a drunk man is banging threateningly on Holly's door, she climbs the fire escape and slips into Paul's apartment. As thanks for "rescuing" her, she invites him to a party, which turns into a loud, rowdy affair. He again comes to her aid when a figure from her past shows up in New York. She inspires him to start writing again. And, for one memorable day, they go out on the town together doing things they have never before done, like shopping at Tiffany's (new for him) and checking out a book citizens bank farmington nm smiths branch a library (new for her). Ultimately, their feelings end up running more deeply than a normal friendship, but, when Paul confesses his love, Holly rebuffs him. She has set her heart on marrying a rich South American (Villalonga) so she will have enough money to support herself and her brother, whose tour of duty in the army is nearly over.

Neither Holly nor Paul is a model citizen. In order to finance her wasteful lifestyle, Holly accepts a weekly payment of $ to visit an ex-mob boss in prison and carry a verbal message to his "lawyer." It's a subtle form of prostitution with no sex involved. The same isn't true of Paul, who could charitably be called a "kept man" (although a gigolo might be more apropos). His lover (Patricia Neal) is a well-to-do woman with a much older husband. She sneaks out to see Paul whenever she gets the opportunity, and his latest apartment is a gift from her. Every time she departs his bed, she leaves behind a care package of greenbacks.

Although both characters have their faults and hard edges, Breakfast at Tiffany's is still first and foremost a fantasy. The use of Henry Mancini's glorious "Moon River" cements the dreamy atmosphere which is introduced at the beginning of the film with establishing shots of a New York City that never was. This is not the real world; it's another sort of place, where Mafia dons are nice men, disappointed suitors react with grace, and improbable lovers can overcome the odds and live life happily ever after. And Holly Golightly is a product of this environment.

Two particular attributes set Breakfast at Tiffany's apart from the overfamiliar continuum of romantic comedies. The first is character depth, particularly where Holly is concerned. Despite her name and her lighthearted disposition, she is actually a troubled individual. Orphaned at an early age, she married the kindly Doc Golightly at the age of 14, then abandoned him for a stint in Hollywood. As played by Buddy Ebson, Doc appears to be a genial elder gentleman, but there's something ambiguous and less-than-wholesome about his relationship with Holly. There's also a question about the status of their marriage. She claims it was annulled long ago, but her tendency to live in a world of her breakfast at tiffanys asian creation brings that into question. For the most part, Holly has done her best to forget the past, but there are instances when it creeps into her mood, turning her sad and wistful.

Then there's the dialogue, which, although neither sparkling nor peppered with scintillating one-liners, is nevertheless solidly written and enjoyable to listen to. The key to its effectiveness is that conversations do not feel truncated - they are allowed to run on naturally. The film's best scenes involve Holly and Paul doing nothing more complicated than talking to each other. Over the years, strong dialogue has been an important characteristic of all the great romantic comedies, from The Philadelphia Story to breakfast at tiffanys asian Sunrise.

For a movie made in the early s, Breakfast at Tiffany's is surprisingly bold. Audrey Hepburn is shown in a number of provocative and revealing costumes (the trailer trumpets that the film offers the actress "as you've never seen her before"), and the screenplay includes several forthright lines with a clear sexual connotation. There also isn't any beating around the bush when it comes to the nature of Paul's secondary profession. Throughout his career, Edwards has never had difficulty pushing envelopes (witness Victor/Victoria or the lightsaber condom scene in the otherwise wretched Skin Deep), and this tendency is evident even at this early stage.

Breakfast at Tiffany's most glaring fault was not considered a problem during the movie's initial release. However, looking back through a year window, the inclusion of the stereotyped Asian character of Mr. Yunioshi (played by Mickey Rooney) borders on offensive. Mr. Yunioshi's sole purpose is to provide cheap comic relief but what might have been funny in has long since lost its humorous edge. The character's presence is a double blow to the Asian community - not only is he fatuous and uncomplimentary, but he is played by a Caucasian actor in heavy makeup.

Fortunately, Mr. Yunioshi is a background character, and his scenes are not plentiful enough to spoil an otherwise agreeable tone. While Breakfast at Tiffany's probably would have been a more powerful and moving story had it stuck to Capote's original storyline, there are advantages to the film's approach. The ending is a little silly and over-the-top, but, in the way of all great romantic finales, it culls a smile and a somewhat wistful sigh from nearly everyone in the audience. For those who considers themselves romantics, or for breakfast at tiffanys asian who just enjoys a simple love story from time-to-time, Breakfast at Tiffany's offers a few pleasures.






Breakfast at Tiffany's (United States, )


Источник: mynewextsetup.us

Is The Breakfast at Tiffany&#;s Boycott Unnecessary?

In New York, an Asian American group is planning to boycott the  Audrey Hepburn film Breakfast at Tiffany, which is being screened in Brooklyn Bridge Park on August 11th. The film is being shown as part of the Park Conservancy’s free outdoor &#;Movies With a View&#; series, which receives some city funding but is primarily sponsored by the SyFy network.

While mainstream audiences will remember the film as a classic, it is also notorious for featuring  Mr. Yunioshi, a Japanese character played in ridiculous yellowface by Mickey Rooney. Many consider Rooney&#;s role to be one of the worst caricatures in Hollywood history and I want to make sure that everybody is absolutely clear on this matter.

But is this film really worth protesting about?

As much as I despise this film&#;s  portrayal of an Asian character, I don&#;t see the point of the protest because I do believe Breakfast at Tiffany&#;s is a classic that deserves to be seen as one of Audrey Hepburn&#;s most timeless films. Now it is interesting to note this film series is supported, in part, by public funds from the New York City Department of Cultural Affairs. Therefore, this will be a public event where kids and adults will be mingling around to watch this film while supposedly having a good summer time. But is it right that this film is to be banned just because there was a racist portrayal of an Asian character that plays a small scene in what is otherwise a pretty fantastic film?

Phil Yu of Angry Asian Man strongly voiced his opinion that the protest for this film is justified. While I completely understand where he&#;s coming from and feel the same outrage as he does over such a stupid character, I believe this protest is an act of bullying to prevent folks from enjoying this film. It seems to be patronizing of us to believe that we are doing the public a service by not showing this film at all. Rather, I think it is necessary that we DO show it and when the Mr. Yunioshi character shows up, there should be a discussion with the audience members, non-Asian and Asians.

Some will argue that this film is just as bad as screening a film with a black face minstrel show. There is definitely some merit to this as racist depictions of Asians tend to get the slip while racist depictions of blacks will guarantee a huge outcry that will get white people all shaken up. But this is not about the volume of protest but rather to focus without getting riled up about the matter at hand. I will argue that unlike black face minstrel shows, Breakfast at Tiffany is not about Mr. Yunioshi, a rather a small supporting role, but about Audrey Hepburn. To boycott a film over a sour patch (or rotten, really) may not the direction we need to go in.

It can be said that because the screening of Breakfast at Tiffany&#;s will expose new audiences to this stereotypical character without comment, even if the Mr. Yunioshi character only shows up in small dosages, it can still be damaging. However, there is no gain to be had if we restrict ourselves from the negative events that has happened in the past. We can only learn if we allow ourselves to see the good and ugly side of things. That&#;s my 2 cents though&#;what do you all think?

(On a side note, it is rather discouraging reading the comments from the New York Post as so far it has been &#;oh lighten up you slanty eyed zipperheads&#;, &#;go make me some fwied wice&#;, to &#;It&#;s a freking movie for God&#;s sake&#;, complete with the grammatical errors. These are the times when I wish I could teleport to each and every single ignorant person&#;s place and slap them with a large rubber fish multiple times.)

About Edward

Edward Hong is an actorand spoken poet. Passion to make a change in this world through the performing arts and breakfast at tiffanys asian defines his ongoing life and it is the struggle against all things unjust that gives him this passion to be one heck of a talkative, stubborn man. It, however, does not mean he strives to be a champion or role model of any community but to be the man who will be honest and say the things nobody will have the balls to say. He is the jester who is outspoken in what he believes in most passionately and therefore cannot be pinpointed that he will do what you expect him to do.

View all posts by Edward →

This entry was posted in Current Events, Discrimination, Entertainment, New York and tagged breakfast at tiffany's, Hollywood, mickey rooney, mr. yunioshi, racism, yellowface. Bookmark the permalink.

Источник: mynewextsetup.us
breakfast at tiffanys asian

Breakfast at tiffanys asian -

Hey! What&#;s up, you guys? It&#;s Awais from Book Summaries, and today it&#;s time for me to finally make my Breakfast at Tiffany&#;s book summary analysis by Truman Capote. I read this book quite a while ago, but I wanted to wait until I saw the movie to do my review to talk about both because most people experience the story for the first time by watching the movie. So, I wanted to talk about both, and it took me a while before I started this and finished it. So, today we&#;re going to be talking about the very, very well-known novella, Breakfast at Tiffany&#;s, by Truman Capote.

Breakfast at Tiffany&#;s book summary Beginning

We&#;re going to start talking about the novella, and then we will talk about the movie and probably compare while talking about this. Breakfast at Tiffany&#;s was published in , and it follows a woman named Holly Golightly.

The narrator of the story is called Fred by Holly, but Holly is the show&#;s star. At the story&#;s beginning, Fred moves into the same building as Holly, and they have a quick friendship. And it follows Fred as he gets to know Holly better and is trying to live his life in New York and be a good friend to Holly. Holly Golightly is not a good person. She is this blonde woman who is very aloof, who is very mysterious. She does not want people to know about her, and so when people ask her questions about herself, she always diverts them to something else.

She has this way that people find her fascinating, and she almost expects people to hang onto her every word. The character, Fred, thinks that she is engaging and pays attention to her a lot. That&#;s why Fred ends up finding out a lot more about her life than most people do around her. Holly, in the story, says that she will never get used to anything. She says that anybody that does might as well be dead or something like that.

Self-Motivation to Become Self-Independent

So, she does not want to settle down. She got afraid of being stuck in one place. She doesn&#;t want to invest in anyplace or anybody. She&#;s okay if people invest in her, but she does not want to reciprocate those feelings. And she works very hard to keep herself separate and independent and on the move. And it just follows these two characters and a few others while they&#;re living in New York, and their lives are very messy. It&#;s one of those situations where you know you are headed towards a bad ending, a messy ending like a train wreck, but you can&#;t look away.

As usual with my book reviews, I&#;m going to go through my pros, go through my cons, give my rating, and then we&#;re going to talk about the movie. My first pro for this book was Holly&#;s characterization. I thought that Holly was so attractive, and that may be because Fred also felt that she was so interesting.

You learn about her in this novella against her will, which the characters know about her. So, as they are almost, like, fighting to be her friend because she makes it difficult, they&#;re learning stuff, and you&#;re learning stuff too. So, you end up getting invested in Holly, and it is so well done. I thought that that was probably one of the biggest pros for this book &#; Holly&#;s characterization and how you learn about her in bits and pieces, and then everything starts to unfold.

Another pro for this book is that I enjoyed the writing style. Fred tells it in kind of, like, different tenses. He switches back and forth, so it seems like someone is talking to you about her in the present or what he thinks she&#;s doing in the present and what happened in the past. So, you get that feeling of someone who is talking to you and describing someone they once knew in their life and sharing memories and just general present-day thoughts. So, I enjoyed that as well. In some of my other reviews, I commented that Truman Capote details in his writing.

So much so that sometimes it bogs down the plots. In this, I didn&#;t feel like that at all. I felt like it had details. It had tiny, little things about Holly that gave you some insights into how she&#;s thinking, or into Fred and how he&#;s thinking, and stuff like that, but it did. So, it didn&#;t slog anything down. There are details like how she keeps her phone in a suitcase and stuff like that &#; and where she keeps her shoes and what she keeps in the oven, which is, like, not pans or anything like that. So, you get all these details, but it&#;s not overbearing. It is a very quick novella to get through. I also really liked Fred as a narrator. He starts very &#; almost innocent.

Fred Growing Up With New Spirit

He&#;s new to New York. He&#;s just figuring things out, and throughout the story, Fred starts to grow and becomes more cynical. And you get to see Fred develop, and change, and learn as he learns more about Holly. So, I think Holly and Fred were both perfect, complete, believable characters, and yeah, I enjoyed Fred. So, I liked the characters. I liked the writing. I thought that the plot was interesting in this as well.

Maybe not as well done as the other two, but I felt invested in the story. I wanted to know what would happen with Holly because you know that she&#;s such a mess that something messy will happen. So, I was waiting to find out what that was going to be and how it would be handled by Holly, Fred, and Truman. as he was writing it. And the last pro that I had written down, which I talked about already, was that I did like knowing &#;

Like, it gave me that feeling that something messy was going to happen, and then it delivered. And I just enjoyed that entire process. I thought that it well did and was enjoyable. It kept my attention the whole time, and yeah, I had a lovely time while reading this. If you want to watch the Breakfast at Tiffany&#;s book summary.

I wrote down a couple of cons. These were not conning for me because they didn&#;t affect my reading experience all that much, but many people hate Holly in this. She expects to be gifted things for nothing. She is not a good person, and she&#;s not a good person &#; like, she&#;s not meant to be. At least, that&#;s how I think about this novella. Like, I wouldn&#;t say I liked Holly. She&#;s terrible, but she&#;s so exciting that I wanted to learn more about her.

So, I think that was the goal, which is what this book &#; this novella &#; delivers. So, if you&#;re going into this and you&#;re thinking that you&#;re going to love Holly, especially if you&#;ve watched the movie, change that expectation because I don&#;t believe that you will like her.

You will find her attractive, though. And the other con that people have for this is that they couldn&#;t connect with any character, which is understandable. Holly is terrible, so it&#;s hard to communicate with her because she is so awful and self-centered in this novella.

Why is it called to breakfast at Tiffany&#;s?

It&#;s the trust that only decent things occur there that styles Tiffany&#;s so tempting to her. So why select this as the title? The title draws consideration to Holly without having to name her precisely – she&#;s the only one in the book who dears the store so much.

And Fred is a little hard to relate to because he follows Holly like a bit of a puppy dog. They are a little challenging to connect with, but I think it&#;s more of an &#;I&#;m watching these messes of people be messes, and it is entertaining.&#; So those didn&#;t affect my reading experience, but they might affect yours if you have different expectations going in.

When I finished this novella, I searched for various reviews, which is how I pulled some of the cons that other people had, but I just had such a good time. I enjoyed this. I ended up giving the novella four stars. Yeah, I think that it is a well-craft novella following really believable messes of people doing messy things.

So, I enjoyed it. Then months after I finished this, I decided it was time to watch the movie finally. It is no secret that Truman Capote wrote this story thinking that Marilyn Monroe would play the main character. And when you read the novella, you&#;ll see the connections between them. Like, the main character in the novella is blonde.

Breakfast at Tiffany&#;s book summary Climax

She is very in charge of her sexuality. Like, men fawn over her, that kind of thing. She&#;s very, very beautiful, and she is like a socialite, and people pay her to go to social events or be at events with them. And I feel like people have that same sense of Marilyn Monroe a little bit, but when it came down to it, the people directing the movie or casting the movie chose Audrey Hepburn because 1) they wanted Audrey Hepburn.

They didn&#;t even think that she would accept the role, and she did anyway. And Marilyn was doing something else. She had some other movie that she was part of. It ended up being Audrey Hepburn, and it&#;s funny. When watching the movie, I was like, &#;These are so similar at the beginning and the middle.&#;

I will say that a character constantly badgers throughout the story in their building and yells at her a lot. I honestly cannot remember if the surface is Asian in the novella. The character was Asian. His name was Yunioshi, and the actor who plays that character is white. And they put him in yellowface, and he was way over the top and offensive.

Like, when I watched the movie, I recoiled when I saw that. It was, like, Woah, this guy looks 1) not Asian, and it was not a good portrayal. I, finishing the movie, watched the special features. They have a whole thing, where I think they&#;re all Asian Americans, talking about it and discussing the representation.

What is breakfast at Tiffany&#;s about?

This novel is about a girl who falls in love with a writer. She struggles to achieve him and wants to see her life partner.

Hey, What was going on at the time, what went on since, and how Asian representation in movies progressed years—stuff like that. So, I appreciate that this edition of the film had that as a unique feature so that people can watch that, and like, learn and know that that was not a good thing.

And the director of this movie even said he would go back and change it, so I&#;m glad to see people are growing. But that was like, Woah! Anyway, the movie is quite similar to the book. Holly is a Huge Mess. She is in this weird situation where she pays to meet someone at a prison similar to here. She&#;s not a great person. She was still very self-centered. The narrator is quite similar as well. They give him a name in the movie and a more interesting backstory, so I think Fred is more interested in the film than he was in the book or the novella.

But I do think they kept a similar spirit in the beginning. In the book and the movie, Holly even talks about something called the mean reds, which is like some extreme anxiety or something similar that she goes through. The only way to alleviate that is to grab some breakfast and go to Tiffany&#;s. And that&#;s why it is called Breakfast at Tiffany&#;s because it calms her down and helps with the mean reds. Even similar events happen where Holly&#;s past comes back into her life, into her present, and that&#;s the same.

Breakfast at Tiffany&#;s Themes
  • Female Freedom and Independence.
  • Money, Joy, and Possessiveness.
  • Life partner, Affection, and Sexuality.
  • Private and Obsession.

It has very similar beats. I will say that the movie is a little bit more like a romantic comedy, almost a movie, and the book is not like that. The film changes things up. It focuses on Fred and Holly about the same. They have a different sort of relationship in the movie than they do in the book. In the film, I like how they say that you end up running into yourself no matter where you run, which I think is partially true, at least in Holly&#;s case.

Audrey Hepburn&#;s portrayal of Holly, though in the movie, is a little more put together. She&#;s a little more, like, classy. I can see why people like Holly more in the film than in the book because they can see how she&#;s dressing and poised just because Audrey Hepburn balanced.

I see why people like her fashion sense, but she&#;s still when it comes down to it, kind of the wrong person in the majority of the movie. And I think the last thing I have to say about the film besides enjoying it is that the movie&#;s ending is so different from the book. I was not expecting it because they were tracking pretty similarly for an extended portion of the story. Here is breakfast at tiffany&#;s book ending.

Breakfast at Tiffany&#;s book summary Ending

Then the ending completely goes in its direction, which I think is a good call because people hate Holly in this novella, and if they kept it the same, they&#;d probably hate her in this as well. So, by changing it, people love her in this movie, and I get it now.

Like, when I finished it and people are like, &#;Audrey Hepburn!&#; and &#;Holly Golightly!&#; and &#;Breakfast at Tiffany&#;s!&#; I understand why this is beloved by people that love Audrey Hepburn because they changed the ending so much. I enjoyed the movie. I wanted the changes. Truman Capote did not enjoy the changes and the film, which I thought was interesting.

Yeah, I enjoyed both. I think you&#;ll enjoy the movie if you know about the lousy portrayal of an Asian in this, and that is not okay. The film is a little bit more romantic, a little easier to digest, and the book is fascinating, and the characters are messy and continue to be confused. So again, I gave Breakfast at Tiffany&#;s four stars. I don&#;t rate movies, but I enjoyed them both. So that&#;s going to be my review for Breakfast at Tiffany&#;s by Truman Capote.

If you like breakfast at tiffany&#;s book review, then support us by subscribing and keep visiting the book summaries. Thank you.

Categories FictionalTags #breakfastattiffany&#;sbookanalysis, #breakfastattiffany&#;sbookending, #breakfastattiffany&#;sbookreview, #breakfastattiffany&#;sbookthemes, #breakfastattiffany&#;scharacters, #whatisbreakfastattiffany&#;sabout, #whyisitcalledbreakfastattiffany&#;sИсточник: mynewextsetup.us

Breakfast at Tiffany’s is off the menu for me because of its racial stereotyping

Despite what Elon Musk says (Keep on trucking: a swipe at rail as Tesla unveils electric lorry, 18 November), there is still a crucial role for rail freight in transporting long-distance consumer and bulk traffic in a safer low-carbon way that reduces road congestion and road damage. Also, lorry platoons already exist and are called freight trains. So, during road safety week ( November) we should remember that last year heavy goods vehicles were almost seven times more likely than cars to be involved in fatal crashes on local roads.
Philippa Edmunds
Freight on rail manager, Campaign for Better Transport

One of my best-loved films, Breakfast at Tiffany’s, is now unwatchable by me for the stereotypical portrayal of Mr Yunioshi by Mickey Rooney (I like Apu from the Simpsons. But I can see the harm in stereotypes, 18 November). My father’s critical perspective was influenced by the heroine being a call girl, but then he’d been through a war against, among others, the Japanese.
Jenny Powell
Storrington, Sussex

Interesting to see a Conservative MP, Damian Collins, apparently referencing Uber as a benchmark for exploitation (UK athletes ‘have fewer rights than an Uber driver’, Sport, 20 November). Just came off the tip of the tongue, I guess…
Sonia Michaels
London

Further to recent letters (20 November), in the 50s in London we had “milk and a dash” at the Lyons Corner Houses – definitely the forerunner of lattes. A lot cheaper, too.
Rosalie Trayner
London

Hurrah! A campaign to rescue Italian words from English mispronunciation. May we add to the list “bruschetta” (broo-sketta, not broo-shetta) and “ciabatta” (cha-batta, not che-a-batta)?
Bernadette Newman
London

Did Theresa May and her husband not go to church on Sunday? There was no photo of them in Monday’s paper.
Susannah Wight
London

Join the debate – email [email protected]

Read more Guardian letters – click here to visit mynewextsetup.us

Источник: mynewextsetup.us

From Breakfast at Tiffany’s to Hellboy: The ongoing problem of Hollywood ‘whitewashing’

Actor Ed Skrein’s much applauded withdrawal from the role of Asian character, Major Ben Daimio, in the Hellboy reboot has again highlighted the pervasive practice of “whitewashing” in contemporary Hollywood. Whitewashing is not new. It was a common practice in classical Hollywood, where some of its most egregious examples include John Wayne as Genghis Khan in The Conqueror and Mickey Rooney as Mr Yunioshi in Breakfast at Tiffany’s.

Audiences know instinctively that whitewashing is bad – hence the criticisms of other whitewashing films and the resulting hashtag #StarringJohnCho that went viral in spring As a cultural practice, having white people play, replace and stereotype characters of colour obscures and erases their history, agency and power. Although it is fair to reject whitewashing as false and offensive on these ideological grounds, to do so without further scrutiny does not allow us to explore the reasons why it exists.

Whitewashing happens in a number of ways. It can be the whitening through casting of a character who was originally a person of colour in historical or source material, as with Daimio in the new Hellboy or Major (Scarlett Johansson) in Ghost in the Shell. But it can also be the casting of a white actor to play a character of colour and the use of makeup, acting and other features of mise-en-scène, editing and narrative to draw on racial attributes – a practice often referred to as Yellow, Brown or Blackface. One early use of the latter includes D W Griffith’s Birth of Nation in a white supremacist text that celebrates the founding of the Ku Klux Klan. All the major black characters are played by white actors in Blackface.

Whitewashing exists historically and contemporaneously in Hollywood because from its early and silent periods Hollywood has, as Daniel Bernardi points out in Classic Hollywood, Classic Whiteness “constructed whiteness as the ‘norm’”. What’s more, Hollywood acting styles have shown “whiteness” to be the norm over “otherness”. Look no further than John Wayne’s impassive acting style in almost every film he appears in. We also see the assumption of whiteness as the norm in the idea that a white actor can play any character by simply “being” themselves or – if they are cast as a character of colour – by putting on an accent, makeup and other ethnically defining attributes and performance styles.

Charlton Heston (far right) played Mexican character Mike Vargas in ‘Touch of Evil’ (Universal International)

The flip side of whitewashing is that an actor of colour can only ever be cast as a character of colour and must perform in a way that marks or over determines their “difference” to the “norm”. Thus, in John Ford’s Three Godfathers, Mexican actor Pedro Armendariz – who actually grew up in the US and spoke English without an accent – has to put on a stereotypical Mexican accent and act with exaggerated gestures to play a Mexican character.

In the post Second World War Hollywood of “liberal” race dramas, whitewashing allowed whiteness to be the clear moral voice of films, even when the narrative focus was on non-white characters. For instance, the sense of visible whiteness that whitewashing permitted is important to the movie Touch of Evil. In it, Charlton Heston plays Miguel Vargas, a Mexican police chief fighting against corruption and organised crime on both sides of the US-Mexico border.

Heston is visually “Mexicanised”: he has curly hair, a moustache and darker skin. But as the hero of the film, it is important that Heston’s whiteness is maintained, at least in terms of his star profile. Interestingly, Heston went almost directly to the character of Vargas after playing Moses in The Ten Commandments – another whitewashing role.

Marvel defended its casting of Tilda Swinton as the Ancient One in ‘Doctor Strange’ after critics said the move had ‘tarnished’ the film (Walt Disney Studios Motion Pictures)

In the contemporary era, the casting of white actors in non-white roles persists. For this, we need look no further than Tilda Swinton as a Tibetan mentor in Doctor Strange. This despite protests from minority advocacy groups demanding more accurate representation and more parts for actors of colour.

The problem of whitewashing is frequently linked to the lack of diversity and institutional racism of a Hollywood film industry that is disproportionately white and male and in which people of colour are underrepresented – not just in front of the camera but also at the executive level and in producer and director roles.

It has been suggested that the key to solving Hollywood’s whitewashing issue is recognising the achievements of those actors and film personnel of colour who are making films. This has been encapsulated in the hashtag #OscarsSoWhite. There needs to be structural change and more effort needs to be made at getting more minorities into the industry. Audiences also need to start signalling to film executives that the casting of white stars in non-white roles is not acceptable. Ed Skrein’s rejection of whitewashing is to be applauded. We will now see if other actors are brave enough to follow his lead.

Dolores Tierney is a senior lecturer in film studies at the University of Sussex. This article was originally published in The Conversation (mynewextsetup.us)

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Already have an account? sign in

Источник: mynewextsetup.us

Is The Breakfast at Tiffany&#;s Boycott Unnecessary?

In New York, an Asian American group is planning to boycott the  Audrey Hepburn film Breakfast at Tiffany, which is being screened in Brooklyn Bridge Park on August 11th. The film is being shown as part of the Park Conservancy’s free outdoor &#;Movies With a View&#; series, which receives some city funding but is primarily sponsored by the SyFy network.

While mainstream audiences will remember the film as a classic, it is also notorious for featuring  Mr. Yunioshi, a Japanese character played in ridiculous yellowface by Mickey Rooney. Many consider Rooney&#;s role to be one of the worst caricatures in Hollywood history and I want to make sure that everybody is absolutely clear on this matter.

But is this film really worth protesting about?

As much as I despise this film&#;s  portrayal of an Asian character, I don&#;t see the point of the protest because I do believe Breakfast at Tiffany&#;s is a classic that deserves to be seen as one of Audrey Hepburn&#;s most timeless films. Now it is interesting to note this film series is supported, in part, by public funds from the New York City Department of Cultural Affairs. Therefore, this will be a public event where kids and adults will be mingling around to watch this film while supposedly having a good summer time. But is it right that this film is to be banned just because there was a racist portrayal of an Asian character that plays a small scene in what is otherwise a pretty fantastic film?

Phil Yu of Angry Asian Man strongly voiced his opinion that the protest for this film is justified. While I completely understand where he&#;s coming from and feel the same outrage as he does over such a stupid character, I believe this protest is an act of bullying to prevent folks from enjoying this film. It seems to be patronizing of us to believe that we are doing the public a service by not showing this film at all. Rather, I think it is necessary that we DO show it and when the Mr. Yunioshi character shows up, there should be a discussion with the audience members, non-Asian and Asians.

Some will argue that this film is just as bad as screening a film with a black face minstrel show. There is definitely some merit to this as racist depictions of Asians tend to get the slip while racist depictions of blacks will guarantee a huge outcry that will get white people all shaken up. But this is not about the volume of protest but rather to focus without getting riled up about the matter at hand. I will argue that unlike black face minstrel shows, Breakfast at Tiffany is not about Mr. Yunioshi, a rather a small supporting role, but about Audrey Hepburn. To boycott a film over a sour patch (or rotten, really) may not the direction we need to go in.

It can be said that because the screening of Breakfast at Tiffany&#;s will expose new audiences to this stereotypical character without comment, even if the Mr. Yunioshi character only shows up in small dosages, it can still be damaging. However, there is no gain to be had if we restrict ourselves from the negative events that has happened in the past. We can only learn if we allow ourselves to see the good and ugly side of things. That&#;s my 2 cents though&#;what do you all think?

(On a side note, it is rather discouraging reading the comments from the New York Post as so far it has been &#;oh lighten up you slanty eyed zipperheads&#;, &#;go make me some fwied wice&#;, to &#;It&#;s a freking movie for God&#;s sake&#;, complete with the grammatical errors. These are the times when I wish I could teleport to each and every single ignorant person&#;s place and slap them with a large rubber fish multiple times.)

About Edward

Edward Hong is an actorand spoken poet. Passion to make a change in this world through the performing arts and activism defines his ongoing life and it is the struggle against all things unjust that gives him this passion to be one heck of a talkative, stubborn man. It, however, does not mean he strives to be a champion or role model of any community but to be the man who will be honest and say the things nobody will have the balls to say. He is the jester who is outspoken in what he believes in most passionately and therefore cannot be pinpointed that he will do what you expect him to do.

View all posts by Edward →

This entry was posted in Current Events, Discrimination, Entertainment, New York and tagged breakfast at tiffany's, Hollywood, mickey rooney, mr. yunioshi, racism, yellowface. Bookmark the permalink.

Источник: mynewextsetup.us

Introduction Popular culture has an effect on its audiences (Wilson mynewextsetup.us, p. 74). It has the ability to invoke reactions and change public opinion. A popular type of popular culture is film. Films are a reflection of society, primarily the thoughts of the elites in society (Wilson et al.,, p. 74) Films that have the most influence on the public are cult classics or iconic films. Iconic films inspire people to change anything from their style to their career, but they also have the ability to change the way people think, by conveying a message that promotes elitist views. Breakfast at Tiffany’s is an iconic film that does just that. Breakfast at Tiffany’s is regarded as one of the most influential films of the twentieth century and for…show more content…
The emergence of the Civil Rights Movements, caused early filmmakers to re-evaluate and revise the way that they were portraying minority characters, however, they continued the use of stereotypes within their characters (Smith,, p). The filmmakers believed that they were making a positive switch to portraying Asian Americans as comical fools, as shown in Breakfast at Tiffany’s as opposed to the cold and menacing villains they once shown to be, but the new portrayal played off racial stereotypes that offended those who watched it (Smith, , p). Another factor that Silk () explains is the reason behind production. Mainstream media was producing for audiences that were primarily white families, so they wanted their products to reflect the lives of those who consumed the media (p. ). At this point in time film was used as an assimilation tactic, which is why white actors were used to play characters of all race (Smith,, p). By hiring white actors to play other races, producers believed that their target audience would be able to relate to characters. (Smith,,

Get Access

Источник: mynewextsetup.us
breakfast at tiffanys asian

Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *